×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Proposed Zoning Bylaw Updates

Share your comments here

With big changes mandated by the Province, and recommendations from Council’s OCP Task Force on Housing, Penticton’s Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw are being updated. Summaries of the changes are available in the Documents section for you to review. You can also go through the Zoning Bylaw changes page by page here and leave your comments. Feedback will be collected through to April 14.
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.

Tina Apr 15 2024 at 12:08AM on page 1

Suggestion
Cherrylane should not be added at this time. Wait and see approach as it can always be added later. Parking issues
0 replies

Loraine Stephanson Apr 14 2024 at 11:08AM on page 1

Suggestion
Cherry Lane should be the main hub. Tallest buildings should be there, NOT near the waterfronts. There is only one other city in the world that is bordered by two lakes. Why must we squander the spacious feel of Lakeshore Drive for the sake of luxury condo owners? Our building heights should be lowest along waterfronts and gradually increase towards the middle of Penticton. If six storeys are allowed along Lakeshore, developers on Churchill and Alexander will ask for 8. T
0 replies

Viv Lieskovsky Apr 2 2024 at 11:01PM on page 61

Question
Is the height restricted to 4 storeys?
0 replies

Gjoa Taylor Mar 31 2024 at 4:25PM on page 43

Question
There has been alot of public feedback about the lack of trees in the urban areas of Penticton. The Urban Forest Plan meetings that were held with various collaborators in the community have made it very clear that developers need to plant more trees when trees are removed. Why not take this opportunity, to revise one tree per dwelling in 5.3.1 to 2 trees and make the size of the trees substantial depending on what is removed? Our city gets a failing grade compared to most cities in BC on tree replacement. Thanks for considering this.
0 replies

Gjoa Taylor Mar 31 2024 at 4:19PM on page 58

Question
Should there be a proper definition given for "principal resident" since you are removing "owner" under Short Term Rentals, 7.6.1? There may be some confusion for people as to what a principal resident is. Food for thought.
0 replies

Cameron Reid Mar 11 2024 at 6:36PM on page 88

Question
The previous (RD1/2/3/4) and unchanged zonings (C1, C2) have a 10.5m height restriction. What is the intention of changing R4-L/S to 11m? Is the max height calculated the same way as before? For comparison, would construction in the new zoning now be higher than what is being built at the old Bogners site (C1 zoning, 10.5m height limit)?
0 replies

Glenda Monts Mar 7 2024 at 6:08PM on page 54

I don't agree that no designated parking space be required for each suite in a dwelling
0 replies

Glenda Monts Mar 7 2024 at 6:05PM on page 54

I don't agree that any residential units should not have parking spaces designated
0 replies

Glenda Monts Mar 7 2024 at 6:01PM on page 40

No development should be allowed without designated parking spaces of one per unit minimum. There is such a small % of the population in the City that do not own at least one vehicle. Then there are also visitors. This becomes problematic for the existing residents with parking!
0 replies

Nikki Morris Mar 4 2024 at 3:21PM on page 86

Suggestion
266, 280, 294 Norton St are newly zoned under this R4-L zoning. But in the new OCP they are 'High Density Residential' alongside 224 Norton St. How is this zoning in line with being 'high density residential'? And why is 224 zoned RM-4 and not R4-L? This entire bank should be true high density residential with the same zoning. Thx for all the hard work on this though!
0 replies
View all